Rene Desacartes and David Hume Essay

Rene Descartes and David Hume were two great philosophers during the neo period. M whatever of their issues foc white plagued on the human beings of paragon. Humes writings on the founding of matinee idol argon different to Descartes. Descartes tries to try Gods existence while Hume tries to yield the lunacy of believing in God. However, both philosophers travel to solve the issue because they both comport many arguments. The major issue amongst Descartes and Hume is their conflicting methods on how the issue should be approached. Rene Descartes was an Enlightenment philosopher.He was too a rationalist. This is the opposite of empiricism as this surmise claims that some companionship can be kn have a priori, independently of scram. This room that if God were to be proved because go steady would non necessarily be needed as some truth. The accounting of oneself is essential to Descartes thesis. That all object dealing except God atomic number 18 delusions promoted by the coherence of experience (Weissman) that is, our everlasting prejudiced experience of the world could be false, although God is receiptn to be true.Having decided that the data-based world and matter could be completely the creation of a devil, Descartes decides to follow his own consciousness, which is the besides thing he could verify on. He is the type of some body who only depends on himself and always thinks I am in situations. Descartes makes the unnecessary assumption that he is the carrier of his combined states. He states, It is so self-evident that it is I who doubt, who understand and who wish, that there is no need to add anything to pardon it.This, as well as the truths of mathematics, is comprehend agnizely and perspicuously. Clear and distinct ideas argon very much relied on in the Cartesian philosophy of psyche for Descartes they atomic number 18 the necessary truths, grabbed by the intelligence. This telephone exchange consciousness he claims equates to a person the divisible body as an across-the-board thing in space and beat is finite, opposed to the infinite, non-physical, monadic soul. This distinction is the foundation of Cartesian onto limpid dualism.The mind and body are separate literals, existing on their own. Descartes believed that he developed a method by breaking a problem eat into eccentrics, accepting ideas that couldnt be doubted and get rid of one close from a nonher. Descartes came to the conclusion that the universe has a mathematically logical structure providing a unified body of experience. He believed that in order to find knowledge, there must(prenominal) be a normal method for achieving the truth, or any experience can not be a dependable source.David Hume was an empiricist which means that he believes all knowledge must get from experience, as there is no subjective knowledge within the mind. If the existence of God were to be proved, it would require someone to experience or suppose his existence from experience in some way, because reason just is inadequate to prove his existence. Humes dress intimately knowledge is skepticism, which means he doesnt believe we have knowledge for authoritative things. He is heavily influenced by the two philosophers, Locke and Berkley.Hume is similar to Berkley exclusively without the part of believing in God. He believes in the analysis of causation. For example you know your mate is in France when you receive a localise card from them in France. Humes expositions are more concerned with a motionless physical brain and a computer graphic order of mind the mind alone can tell us anything about the world. It contains an idea that simple and complex ideas are formed by direct lore of objects or self-reflection. Humes change incorporates an explanation on Lockes ambiguous use of idea.He constitutes separately to perceptions of sensations and those of reflection. open ideas of Locke such as space and judgment of con viction became complex ideas for Hume. All perceptions are substances, equal to(p) of existence independent of the observer. Therefore we are perceptions, with a non-observable self. Furthermore since there can be no event of self, the idea of identity is weak. It is important to know that in Humes plan in order for people to obtain knowledge of something they must experience it first.Descartes believed that everything known, depends on perception, but if perception doesnt have depict not only from itself but also from the outside world than it will not be able to verify anything. correspond to Hume, perceptions, can be cut low-spirited to impressions and ideas. Axioms, were self evident principals which were so clear and distinct that they could not be doubted, and wherefore accepted as certain content of knowledge. Contrary to Descartes belief that effects must come from a cause, Hume believed that causes are cadaverous and uncertain.This contrasts sharply with Descartes pr oposal of primary and supplementary qualities. The primary qualities of objects are their geometric, indubitable measurements such as their extension, mass and location in space. These are only indirectly perceive through the secondary qualities of appearance, such as colour and tangibility. Descartes seeks to avoid a still representationalist stance and attempts to further justify a belief in an external earth beyond our mental field of perception, and show that it is dependent on God.This is closely cerebrate with Descartes equivocation of clear and distinct ideas they refer both to the mathematical axioms of geometry in a triangle there is a certain determinate nature or totality or form of it, immutable and eternal, which has not been feigned by me, nor does it depend on me and to empirical statements about extension in space in the Fifth guess he seeks to discover something certain concerning material things