Harmony and Dream

David countenance essays his employment as the NY Times premiere blimpish columnist in a very unique way he disregards conservatism. Now, regardless of where ones opinions may rest when it comes to political ideologies, neither a liberal, moderate, or conservative would recognize support writings as being conservative in every form. Actually, most of his writing is often self-centered and incoherent. This is most perspicuous in the extremely obtuse article Harmony and the Dream which purportedly promotes the qualities of modern mainland china and urges the United States to follow in its footsteps.The reason the backchat supposedly is used here is because Brooks writings display a complete lack of understanding of both modern chinaware and its history. Actually, it similarly displays a fundamental understanding of what makes Americas infrastructure work. take away the following excerpt, If you ask a Chinese person to describe a fish tank, the Chinese lead usually describe the context in which the fish swim. What type of silliness is this assessment? Ask a Chinese person? Does this mean every single person who lives in China depart share the same opinion?Such an assessment infers that China consists of a homogenous entity of like minded people. This is an absurd sentiment and apocalyptic of a fundamental lack of understanding of Chinese history and culture. The nonion of collective thought may be line of the rulers of the Chinese commie Party, but it is not the philosophy that the totality of Chinas existence prescribes. Also, Brooks infers that the collectivism of communistic China somehow has a alarming trait to it. It would seem Brooks points out that collectivism leads to some aeonian group salvation.He even faults the common American tradition of liberty. This is evidenced in his statement The individualistic countries tend to put rights and privacy first. People in these societies tend to overvalue their own skills and overestimate thei r own importance to any group effort. Such a statement ignores the fact that Chinese communist rule is little more than totalitarianism by committee. Really, China embodies galore(postnominal) of the qualities of a police state. Even by collectivist standards, China is extreme.In fact, if you were to consider other nations that promote strong centralized government control you will not see the repression found in China. Venezuela, for example, prescribes to Marxist ideologies but it does not use the state to sponsor murdering prisoners to sell their organs on the population market. Chinas government has engaged in this type of natural process and other insane human rights violations for years. To hint that the United States (or any nation) should face up to China as an example of how to model their society is absurd.Yes, China possesses an exploding parsimoniousness many nation envy. But, how did China arrive at such an expand thriftiness? Largely though paying laborers extr emely low allowance with no worker protections. This is certainly not the type of society to emulate even though Brooks suggests as much. The main problem with Brooks is assertion is that he does not examine the flaws present in Chinas infrastructure. For example, he praises Chinas economy but fails to name the extreme pollution caused by Chinas industry.The pollution poured in the air by many factories is so voluminous that it surely will have a serious, negative effect on the populations health. This brings about an important question what is the value of a booming economy if it ultimately reduces the quality of peoples lives. This is one of the many questions Brooks does not address. This (among other reasons) is why Harmony and the Dream remains an improbably flawed article. Bibliography Brooks, D. (2008, August 11) Harmony and the Dream. NY TIMES. 11 August 2008. Retrieved September 23, 2008 from http//www. nytimes. com/2008/08/12/opinion/ 12brooks. html