The Endangered Species Act of 1973 :: Conservation Biology Wildlife Essays

The threaten Species Act of 1973The Endangered Species Act of 1973 is one of the most powerful tools that environmentally concerned citizens rent to preserve biodiversity. Specific categories that the Endangered Species Act (ESA) includes are the listing of exist species, Endangered species, and the designation of critical ha molybdenumat. When these categories are identified, it is the U.S. Fish and Wildlife assistant (USFWS) which assumes the responsibility of enforcement. Development of recovery plans, Biological or Environmental Assessments, and the developing of Habitat Conservation Plans are just some of the tasks for USFWS (Smallwood, et al,). This act which was originally enacted in 1973, and its reauthorization, is now going through quite a bit of debate. The ESA has actually been awaiting reauthorization from Congress since 1995 (Reid, 1995). There are two of import ideas for bills to heart the ESA. There are bills that will strengthen the Act by punctuate endanger ed species recovery over extinction risk. The other bills will intermit the Act by bringing more attention to the needs of businesses and landowners (Brown, et al). The main controversy seems to arise from economic and social concerns. There is also a great deal of scientific concern ab come forward the accurate carrying out of this species-saving act. I was recently alerted to the economic ramifications of this Act through a local anesthetic issue I put up been looking into. My frustrations mounted when I wise(p) the USFWS gave an OK to developers, to bulldoze through a pristine habitat in my community. Seeing that six threatened and endangered species make their home here, I couldnt understand why the USFWS had backed down. The answer, which seems all too commons was, the USFWS simply doesnt have enough money to trenchantly nurse these species at this time. Consequently the majority of my paper will focus on some of the economic issues the ESA is faced with. Question number one is How effective has the ESA been? This question is difficult for both scientists and government officials to answer. Most agree that the keep down of time since the ESA was enacted is really too short of a time halt to impartially answer this question. I will attempt to point out some of the facts. Since the inception of the Act in 1973, 11 species of more than 1,000 listed have recovered and have been removed from the list, including the eastern states brown pelican, Utahs Rydberg milk-vetch, and the California gray whale (Brown, et al, 1998).