Trying times for President Clinton during the sex sandal with monica Term Paper

Trying times for President Clinton during the sex sandal with monica lewinsky - Term Paper ExampleThe impeachment of the former prexy came as a result of the scandal and a law suit that was filled by Paula Jones (Neal, 2005135). This served as the second impeachment of a chairman in male monarch in the United States of America after the impeachment of the former president Andrew Johnson in the year 1868 (Neal, 2005136). When the impeachment proceedings were brought forward against the president in 1998 several issues were raised against the political processes. While some scholars took the matter lightly, others argued that sexual conduct is a serious offense and is adequate to remove an elected president from the office. Those in support of the president argued that president only when like any citizen of the United States have the right to privacy. They also stated that many other former presidents like John F. Kennedy, Roosevelt as well as Warren G. Harding had been linked to extensive extramarital sexual activity but their sexual conduct was not made available to the public. As observed by Chapman (2010 99), the European observers were surprised that Americans engaged in impeachment proceedings against Bill Clinton because he lied about his sexual conduct. In their argument, they stated that just like any citizen of America would avoid the truth about his sexual fidelity and so Bill Clinton will. In the impeachment case against Clinton, separation of power prevailed done the proceedings. In this context, the act of not telling the truth with respect to the sexual misconduct does not base enough evidences necessary for impeachable offenses as defined by the constitution of the country as high crimes and misdemeanors (Chapman, 201099). In this argument therefore, the impeachment against the president seemed partisan and was seen as an attempt by the legislature to extend its powers and responsibility aside the boundary. According to Chapman (2010100), the charges that the former president faced were not worth impeachment because they did not grow from the failure of the president with regard to the state functions. However, the failure was from his personal living which is different from his public and political life. These differences in arguments divided the legislature and there was a pee boundary in terms of opinions between the republicans and the democrats. The question of what could constitute impeachment against a president had dominated the list of issues during Clintons administration. However, the fact that congress was dominated by the Republicans presented a threat to the former president since the issue had taken political angle dividing the house into pro and against impeachment camps. It is this time that the congress dominated by Republicans appointed a charge to investigate the financial backgrounds of the president (Kogan & Kelso, 2009 308). The counsel which was headed by Kenneth Starr was given further r esponsibilities to investigate the scandal surrounding the former president and the white house intern, Monica Lewinsky. In close analysis of the unfolding events, it is clear that the push for the investigations and the impeachment of the former president was more political than legal. This is because the political enemies took the opportunity finish him politically. The trouble began when it became apparent that the intern, Monica had told